Risk-based guardrails calculator

Kitces and Tharp argued that Guyton-Klinger trips on the wrong number. The current withdrawal rate is a symptom. Remaining probability of success is the thing a household actually cares about.

The calculator

First-year spending$40,000
Spending after the run$222,8682 cuts, 14 raises
Ending portfolio$115,426Horizon completed
Success rate53%1000 seeded paths
10th percentile ending$0
Median ending$83,330
90th percentile ending$3,174,969

How the rails trip

Each year spending is indexed with inflation, then a seeded batch of paths estimates remaining success at the current spend. Below the floor, cut. Above the ceiling, raise. That is the probability-of-success guardrail Kitces described, which only a tool that can actually compute remaining odds can implement. Guyton-Klinger, by contrast, looks only at the current withdrawal rate — see the guardrails explainer.

Assumptions

The displayed path uses the mean return you typed, one year at a time. Remaining success is estimated with 80 seeded paths per review so the page stays usable. The 1,000-path band below is the overall constant-spend check, not the rail estimator.

Frequently asked questions

How are these different from Guyton-Klinger?
Guyton-Klinger trips on the current withdrawal rate versus the initial rate. Risk-based guardrails trip on an estimate of remaining probability of success. A high withdrawal rate after a crash may still be fine if the horizon is short.
How is remaining success estimated?
Each review year the calculator runs a seeded batch of market paths on the remaining balance, remaining horizon and current spend. Same engine as the optional 1,000-path band on the other free tools.